🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear Ruben Amorim was able to withstand a loss to lower-league opposition. Survive a decisive European final versus a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He withstood home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, squandering the team's best academy products, a poor winning percentage, calling his team the worst in Manchester United history. But there was a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, Amorim took on the executive and appears to have missed. Even the most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who frequently berated at his players for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling in the face of the intense pressure and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

And frankly, this entire painful saga appears to portray the director in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, given his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to view him as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual who owed his position largely to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has demonstrated as one of football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that the club's mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

A Strategic Clash Over Formation & Philosophy

For example, it was the director who being involved in the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when delivered from the mouth of a man the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is walking away with full compensation, with no penalty clause activated. The director seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Authority In Command

Naturally, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his desire for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for the club to embrace data science and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach of play “shall be determined by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in industry and yachting. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply better. Whom else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a modern arena that appears a lot like an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

The New Soccer Order: Directors Over Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and drive to join an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have these guys set up? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the strategy by the directors and hire a coach who will adapt their methods accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they have become more like delivery personnel: not creating the product, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, their job has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined while those individuals who hired him live to blunder another day.

The Modern Corporate Game: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance at work: the rise of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose choices are always untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss him for playing too much 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and then bin him for taking too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.